Back to results for “CI/CD”
.NET › API Versioning

How does API versioning strategy differ for internal microservice-to-microservice APIs versus public-facing external APIs?

Advanced

Answer

Internal APIs, where the team controls both producer and consumer and can coordinate deployments, often favor looser versioning (or none at all) relying on contract testing and coordinated rollouts, sometimes accepting brief compatibility windows during deploys. Public external APIs, where consumers are unknown, numerous, and can't be coordinated with directly, require much stricter, longer-lived versioning with generous deprecation windows and strong backward-compatibility guarantees, since a breaking change can silently fail for consumers you don't even know about.
// Internal service-to-service: looser, coordinated deploys
// Both OrderService and InventoryService deploy together, contract tests catch mismatches in CI

// Public external API: strict versioning, long deprecation windows
// /api/v1 supported for 12+ months after v2 launches, with proactive client communication
Real-world example A company's internal order-processing microservices skip formal API versioning entirely, relying on consumer-driven contract tests in CI to catch breaking changes before deployment, while their public partner API maintains three concurrent versions with a strict 18-month deprecation policy.

Common follow-ups: What is consumer-driven contract testing (e.g., Pact)?;How do service meshes help manage internal API compatibility during rollouts?